Speaker frequency response charts | Warehouse Guitar Speakers
NOW FREE SHIPPING TO 48 CONTIGUOUS UNITED STATES ON ALL ORDERS!!!

Speaker frequency response charts

Error message

Notice: unserialize(): Error at offset 0 of 22 bytes in variable_initialize() (line 1202 of /home/wgsusa/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
3 posts / 0 new
Last post  |
Wm Anderson
05/18/2018 8:57am

I had just posted this to the recent blog "What a Guitar Speaker Sensitivity Spec Really Means in the Real World", but decided to bring it over here as I think there's more lurking by those really in the know. I tried to delete it from there but it won't let me.

Combining this blog post with a previous one from 8/2015 "Thiele/Small Sensitivity Specs: When Numbers Lie (or at least don’t tell the whole truth)" here's my question(s). Why doesn't WGS show frequency response charts like I see "elsewhere"? Do they matter and don't they explain/support some of what these two articles discuss? Or, are the charts also misleading.

Thx.

Narcoleptigon_47048
05/18/2018 10:46am

Other than how the cab design affects the bass response with a given speaker, SPL graphs are misleading in that they don't show how the speaker impedance curve interacts with a tube amp or how cone resonances and internal cab modes and early reflections color the sound. I still find the graphs somewhat useful.

I believe guitar players generally base their opinions on what makes a good cab sound on what we hqve heard thus far. I think the original Marshall 4x12" design has some drawbacks that are in no way beneficial. Jim Marshall had admitted that the idea was just to fit as many speakers into the smallest size possible with little consideration for how it affected the sound. Disregarding the beaming effect, It's actually not that bad tonally. Some benefit might be achieved with rear padding in upper-mid smoothness with some speakers by eliminating various resonant peaks and cancelations, if the resulting dryer sound is acceptable, and stronger punch may also be achieved with a thicker rear panel. A simple alteration which may eliminate the ~700Hz dip would be to add a separator to raise the cancelation above 1kHz where it wouldn't generally be noticed, but that might be more trouble than necessary.

VAUGHN SKOW
05/18/2018 11:33am

Yes, I'll just echo an simplify what's already been said ... freq charts have such a HUGE capacity for being misleading that they usually cause folks to make more bad decisions than good ones ... for the reasons posted above by Narco...